Skip to main content

3 posts tagged with "ABM"

View All Tags

6sense Review 2026: Powerful ABM Platform or Overpriced Black Box? (Honest Take)

Β· 7 min read
sunder
Founder, marketbetter.ai

6sense is one of the most ambitious platforms in B2B sales tech. It promises to use AI and intent data to predict which accounts are in-market to buy β€” before they ever fill out a form. The pitch: stop guessing, start selling to accounts that are already researching your category.

In theory, it's transformative. In practice? The reality is more complicated. 6sense delivers genuine value for enterprise ABM teams with the budget and patience to implement it. But for everyone else, the steep pricing, complex setup, and opaque algorithms create friction that can outweigh the benefits.

We analyzed G2 and TrustRadius reviews, talked with teams using 6sense, and compared it against modern alternatives. Here's what holds up and what doesn't.

What 6sense Does Well​

1. Intent Data at Scale​

6sense's core strength is processing massive amounts of intent data to identify accounts showing buying behavior:

  • 500B+ intent signals analyzed across channels
  • Keyword-level tracking β€” see which topics target accounts research
  • Buying stage predictions β€” AI categorizes accounts into stages (Awareness, Consideration, Decision, Purchase)
  • Bombora integration plus proprietary first-party signals

For enterprise ABM teams, this means prioritizing outreach based on where accounts sit in the buying journey rather than guessing. When it works, it genuinely shortens sales cycles.

2. Predictive Buying Stages​

6sense's AI models predict which accounts are most likely to convert and what stage they're in. This powers:

  • Account scoring that goes beyond basic firmographic fit
  • Segment building based on predicted intent + ICP match
  • Orchestration β€” trigger different campaigns based on buying stage

The prediction models get better over time as they learn from your closed-won data, which means long-term users see compounding value.

3. Advertising Integration​

6sense's display advertising capabilities let you:

  • Retarget identified accounts across the web
  • Run ABM campaigns targeting specific account lists
  • Measure ad influence on pipeline
  • Sync audiences to LinkedIn, Google, and programmatic networks

This integration between intent data and advertising is genuinely useful for coordinating marketing and sales efforts around the same accounts.

4. Free Tier Exists​

Unlike most enterprise platforms, 6sense offers a free Community plan with:

  • Basic company data
  • Limited intent signals
  • Contact search (with caps)
  • Chrome extension for prospecting

It's not full-featured, but it lets small teams test the waters without a sales call.

Where 6sense Falls Short​

1. Pricing Is Enterprise-Only​

Despite the free tier, 6sense's paid plans are firmly enterprise-priced:

  • Team plan: Estimated $30,000-$50,000/year (not publicly listed)
  • Growth plan: $50,000-$100,000+/year
  • Enterprise: $100,000+/year for the full platform
  • Advertising costs are additional β€” and escalate quickly with refined targeting
  • Multi-year contracts are standard

For SMBs and mid-market companies, this pricing is a non-starter. You're paying enterprise ABM platform prices before you know if intent data will work for your specific market.

2. The Black Box Problem​

This is the most common complaint from 6sense users across review platforms:

  • Intent scores feel opaque β€” "why does this account show Decision stage?"
  • Hard to validate predictions β€” you can't easily see what signals drove a score
  • Trust requires faith β€” teams either believe the AI or don't, with limited visibility in between
  • False positives waste SDR time β€” accounts flagged as "in-market" that aren't actually buying

One TrustRadius reviewer noted: "Exclusions are too simple. There's no logic for two conditions, either/or statements. This results in accounts missing from our ICPs."

When your $50K+/year platform tells an SDR to call an account and the prospect says "we're not looking at anything right now," trust erodes quickly.

3. Steep Learning Curve​

6sense is not a "log in and go" platform:

  • Implementation takes months β€” not days or weeks
  • Requires dedicated admin β€” often a full-time RevOps resource
  • Advanced features demand training β€” most teams underutilize the platform significantly
  • Segment building is complex β€” the flexibility is a double-edged sword

Teams without RevOps support often end up using 6sense as an expensive prospecting database rather than the AI-powered ABM orchestration tool they bought.

4. Company-Level, Not Action-Level​

Like ZoomInfo, 6sense excels at telling you WHICH accounts to pursue but falls short on telling SDRs WHAT TO DO:

  • No daily SDR playbook β€” reps get account lists and scores, not prioritized task lists
  • No "call this person, say this" workflow β€” SDRs still figure out the approach themselves
  • No real-time engagement β€” no AI chatbot intercepting visitors as they browse
  • No unified execution β€” teams still need separate tools for email, calling, and chat

The gap between "this account is in-market" and "this SDR books a meeting" is still largely manual.

5. Website Visitor ID Is Company-Level​

6sense identifies companies visiting your website, not specific people:

  • Company-level resolution only β€” "Acme Corp visited" but not "Jane from Acme"
  • No person-level identification for known contacts revisiting your site
  • No real-time alerts for individual visitor sessions
  • Relies on IP-to-company mapping with inherent accuracy limits

For account-based teams this is adequate. For teams that want to know the specific person researching your product, it's a gap.

Who 6sense Is Best For​

Enterprise ABM teams (500+ employees) who:

  • Run coordinated marketing + sales motions against named accounts
  • Have budget for $50K+/year platform spend
  • Have RevOps resources to implement and manage
  • Sell high-ACV deals ($50K+) where intent data ROI is clear
  • Need advertising + intent data integration

6sense is NOT ideal for:

  • SMBs or mid-market companies (pricing is prohibitive)
  • Teams that need quick time-to-value (months-long implementation)
  • SDR teams that need daily playbooks and task prioritization
  • Companies wanting person-level visitor identification
  • Teams without dedicated RevOps support

6sense vs. MarketBetter: Different Approaches to Intent​

Capability6senseMarketBetter
Pricing$30K-$100K+/yearTransparent, SMB-friendly
Intent dataTopic-level (Bombora)Page-level (your actual website)
Visitor IDCompany-levelCompany + person-level
Daily playbookβŒβœ… Prioritized SDR tasks
Buying stage predictionβœ… AI-poweredβœ… Based on actual behavior
Display advertisingβœ… Built-in❌ (focus is direct sales action)
Smart dialerβŒβœ… Warm call routing
AI chatbotβŒβœ… Instant engagement
Setup timeMonthsHours
Best forEnterprise ABMSMB-Mid Market SDR teams

6sense asks: "Which accounts in our TAM are showing intent?"

MarketBetter asks: "Who's on our website right now, and what should we do about it?"

Both questions matter. But for most B2B teams, the second question drives faster pipeline because you're acting on first-party buying behavior β€” not third-party topic signals.

The Bottom Line​

6sense is a legitimate enterprise ABM platform. The intent data is real, the predictive models improve over time, and the advertising integration is unique. For large organizations running coordinated ABM plays across marketing and sales, it delivers value that's hard to replicate.

But the market has moved. In 2026, the choice isn't just "buy 6sense or go without intent data." New platforms deliver intent signals β€” from your actual website traffic β€” combined with SDR execution tools, at a fraction of the cost. The question is whether topic-level intent from third-party data is worth 10x more than page-level intent from your own website visitors.

For most teams under 500 employees: it's not. The money you'd spend on a 6sense contract could fund your entire sales tech stack β€” CRM, visitor ID, email sequences, dialer, and AI chatbot β€” with budget left over.

Our recommendation: If you're an enterprise with an established ABM program and the budget to support it, 6sense is a strong option. For everyone else, start with your own website traffic data. The 98% of visitors leaving anonymously are a more actionable signal than third-party topic intent β€” and tools that capture those signals cost a fraction of 6sense's annual contract.


See intent data from your actual website. Book a demo to see how MarketBetter identifies visitors, prioritizes leads, and tells your SDRs exactly what to do β€” starting in hours, not months.

ABM FAQ: What Actually Works in Account-Based Marketing (From Practitioners, Not Textbooks)

Β· 11 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

Most ABM content reads like it was written by someone who's never run an ABM program. "Select your target accounts. Personalize your messaging. Align sales and marketing." Thanks, very helpful.

This FAQ is different. Every answer comes from practitioners who've actually built and run ABM programs at scale β€” the people who know that your biggest enemy isn't bad strategy, it's sales leadership asking you to add 50 more accounts to the list.

If you're running ABM (or thinking about it), these are the questions you're actually asking behind closed doors.


How many accounts should each ABM team member own?​

This is the single most important question in ABM, and almost everyone gets it wrong.

The traditional trap: sales appetite increases, they want more accounts added, and suddenly your ABM team member is "covering" 200 accounts. At that point, you're not doing ABM anymore β€” you're doing slightly more targeted demand gen with a fancier name.

Here's what actually works:

  • Major/strategic accounts (think Disney, Capital One-sized): 20 accounts max per person. These are accounts where your rep knows the CEO's golf handicap. That level of intimacy requires a hard cap.
  • Prospect team (non-customers you're trying to land): 2–3 ABM accounts per rep, in addition to their broader book.
  • Total ABM coverage: 120–150 accounts per ABMer when you add up the pods.

The hard rule: maximum 20 accounts per AE regardless of account size. Can you switch accounts? Yes, but only with decision-chain approval. No random "Hey, can you add Acme Corp to my list?" swaps. That discipline is what separates real ABM from a rebranded target account list.

Where MarketBetter fits: Visitor identification helps you spot which of your 20 accounts are actually on your site right now, so your reps focus energy on accounts showing real activity β€” not just the ones they happen to remember.


How do you pick which accounts to target?​

It's a partnership between data science and sales leadership β€” not a marketing committee with a spreadsheet.

The best programs work like this:

  1. Data science builds the model. It identifies accounts that are both a good fit (firmographic, technographic) and showing high intent (behavioral signals, content consumption, site visits).
  2. Sales leadership whittles down the list. Data science might surface 300 candidates; sales picks the 150 they actually want to pursue and parcels them across reps.
  3. The list changes throughout the year. This is a dynamic process. Based on sales feedback, accounts rotate in and out. A "set it and forget it" target account list is a dead ABM program.

The critical thing most teams miss: intent data isn't just a marketing signal β€” it's the tiebreaker when sales is debating which 20 accounts to focus on. If two accounts look equally promising but one is surging on your site, that's your answer.


How do you actually measure ABM? (Because MTA looks terrible.)​

If you measure ABM the same way you measure demand gen campaigns, you'll kill the program in two quarters.

Here's the measurement framework that works:

Control groups are non-negotiable.​

Split your universe into ABM accounts and non-ABM accounts (the control group). Measure the lift between them across down-funnel metrics:

  • Qualified opportunity creation rate
  • Conversion rates through pipeline stages
  • Average deal values
  • Win rates

This is the only honest way to show ABM impact. Traditional multi-touch attribution models will make ABM look terrible because ABM influence is diffuse, long-cycle, and relationship-driven. MTA was built for campaigns with clear start/end dates β€” that's not ABM.

Pre-opportunity awareness stages matter.​

The best ABM programs define 6 awareness micro-stages before an opportunity even exists:

  1. Completely unaware β€” they don't know you exist
  2. Lightly aware β€” someone's visited your site, maybe once
  3. Early engagement β€” downloading content, attending a webinar
  4. Medium engagement β€” multiple stakeholders interacting
  5. Quite engaged β€” active conversations, demo requests
  6. Opportunity ready β€” sales has a path to proposal

Each stage gets different treatments. And critically, each stage is verifiable through data queries β€” not gut feel.

Pro tip: Prime your finance team early. Tell them: "MTA is going to look terrible for ABM. Here's why that's expected, and here's how we're measuring real impact instead." If you don't have this conversation before budget reviews, you'll spend those reviews defending your program instead of growing it.


Do paid social ads work for ABM?​

They work for about three weeks. Then they become wallpaper.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: paid social for ABM brand awareness morphs into targeted demand gen faster than you think. And for small ABM audiences, digital saturation makes it dramatically less effective.

The math is brutal. When you're targeting 20 accounts, even a modest ad spend means those people are seeing your creative 300+ times per day. At that point, you're not building awareness β€” you're creating creative fatigue and potentially negative brand impact.

If you're going to run paid social for ABM, here's the rule:

  • Refresh creative every 2–3 weeks minimum for small audiences
  • Accept that supersaturation is inevitable and plan for it
  • Don't measure it like a demand gen campaign β€” it's air cover, not a conversion engine

Better use of that budget? Read on.


What ABM tactics actually move the needle?​

The most effective plays are sales-led ideas, not marketing-led campaigns.

This is the part that makes marketers uncomfortable: the best ABM activations come from reps who know their accounts intimately. Marketing's job is to operationalize and fund those ideas, not to come up with them in a conference room.

High-touch, in-person activations that actually work:​

Hyper-specific dinners around pain points or industries. Not "thought leadership dinners" with a generic panel. We're talking about booking a table at a place like Cezanne β€” an expensive SF restaurant β€” for 8 people from mid-funnel accounts who all share a specific operational challenge. The conversation IS the value. The deal acceleration is the ROI.

Coffee truck activation. Park a branded coffee truck in NYC's Financial Services district. Your target accounts' employees walk past every morning. It's not scalable and it's not measurable in your MAP. It works anyway.

Super Bowl suites for top-tier accounts. Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it when the account is worth $5M+ in ARR. The relationship acceleration in one evening beats six months of email sequences.

BeyoncΓ© concert for women CFOs β€” bring the family. This is real. One team identified that their target buyer persona was senior women finance leaders. They bought a block of BeyoncΓ© tickets and invited targets to bring their families. It's memorable, it's personal, and it shows you see them as humans β€” not just a logo on your target account list.

The key success factors nobody talks about:​

  1. Only do these for accounts you already know somewhat. Cold invites to expensive dinners feel desperate, not impressive. These are mid-to-late funnel plays for accounts already in motion.
  2. Immediate follow-up is mandatory. The AE calls the next morning β€” not 8 days later. The half-life of event goodwill is measured in hours.
  3. Field marketer + AE pod structure. One field marketer paired with a small group of AEs. The marketer handles logistics and accountability; the AE owns the relationship. Without this structure, events happen and nothing comes after.

Where MarketBetter fits: The daily playbook keeps AEs accountable for those next-morning follow-ups. When a dinner guest hits your site the next day, your rep sees it immediately β€” no chance of the lead going cold because someone forgot to check Salesforce.


What tech stack do you actually need for ABM?​

You probably don't need 6sense or Demandbase. There, we said it.

The conventional wisdom says you need a $100K+/year ABM platform. The practitioners we've talked to prefer something leaner:

The preferred stack:​

  • Snowflake + HighTouch β€” More flexible and dramatically more cost-effective than 6sense or Demandbase. Snowflake gives you native account grouping capabilities. HighTouch lets you pipe that data to any downstream platform.
  • Gifting vendor β€” ReachDesk or Sendoso for scaled gifting. Bespoke partners for Fortune 100 accounts (generic gift boxes don't cut it when you're sending to a Disney VP).
  • Visitor identification β€” You need to know when target accounts are on your site. MarketBetter's person-level identification gives you individual visitors, not just anonymous company-level pings.
  • CRM + a way to track account progression β€” Whatever you're using now, plus the 6-stage awareness model we discussed above.

The point: your ABM stack should be modular and data-first, not a monolithic platform that locks you into one vendor's view of intent.


How do you budget for ABM when finance doesn't "get it"?​

Start small. Test with existing digital spend. Don't ask for a massive new budget on day one.

The budget approach that works:

  1. Redirect existing digital spend. You're probably wasting money on broad display ads anyway. Take that budget and focus it on your target accounts.
  2. Don't measure it like traditional campaigns. This is worth repeating: if you run ABM through your standard campaign reporting, it will look like a failure. ABM deals take longer to close but close at higher values. Your quarterly campaign dashboard can't capture that.
  3. Focus on holistic account progression. Show finance that accounts in the ABM program move through stages faster, convert at higher rates, and close at larger deal sizes. That's the story β€” not cost-per-lead.

The single most important conversation: tell finance upfront that MTA attribution will look terrible. If they're expecting to see "ABM campaign β†’ $500K pipeline" in HubSpot, you've already lost. Set expectations before the first dollar is spent.


When should you stop an ABM tactic?​

When it starts feeling like demand gen, it's already too late.

The clearest signal: you're refreshing creative for the same paid social audience for the fourth time in two months and engagement is flat. At that point, you've crossed from ABM into targeted demand gen β€” and not even good targeted demand gen, because your audience is supersaturated.

Rules of thumb for killing tactics:

  • Paid social ads: If engagement drops after 2–3 weeks despite creative refreshes, stop. Reallocate to in-person activations.
  • Generic email sequences: If open rates are declining on your target account list, your "personalized" emails aren't personalized enough. Go back to the drawing board or switch to truly personalized outreach.
  • Any tactic where marketing is driving and sales isn't engaged: ABM without active sales participation is just marketing. If your AEs aren't contributing ideas and following up, the tactic is dead regardless of the metrics.

How do I know if my program is real ABM or just targeted demand gen?​

Ask yourself three questions:

  1. Can your ABM team member name every key stakeholder at their accounts? If the answer is "they can look it up in the CRM," that's demand gen.
  2. Are your activations things a sales rep suggested? If every play was designed in a marketing brainstorm, that's demand gen.
  3. Is your account list stable enough that reps build real relationships? If accounts rotate every quarter based on marketing's scoring model, that's demand gen.

Real ABM is intimate. It's 20 accounts that your rep knows cold β€” the org chart, the politics, the pain points, the CEO's kids' names. If you can't get to that level of knowledge because you're spread across 200 accounts, you're doing something else. That "something else" might still be valuable, but call it what it is.


Ready to add intent signals to your ABM program?​

The best ABM programs combine relationship intelligence (what your reps know) with behavioral signals (what your data shows). MarketBetter bridges that gap β€” identifying the specific people from your target accounts visiting your site, surfacing them in a daily playbook your reps actually use, and tracking engagement through every stage of the buying journey.

No $100K platform contract. No 6-month implementation. Just the signals your ABM team needs to focus on the right accounts at the right time.

Book a demo β†’

The ABM Strategy That Hit 75% of Monthly Meeting Quota in One Day

Β· 15 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

Every ABM team has had this moment.

You've done the work. You've built the account list. You've run the campaigns. Your dashboards are glowing green β€” engagement scores are up, accounts are "warming," and the data says your target list is moving through the funnel.

Then you walk into the sales standup and hear: "So... where are the meetings?"

That's the gap. And it's where most ABM programs quietly die β€” not from bad strategy, but from optimizing for the wrong outcome.

One enterprise ABM leader at a $3B+ company figured this out the hard way. And the moment they changed what they were optimizing for, everything clicked.

"The moment everything got easier was when I stopped optimizing for 'warm accounts' and started optimizing for meetings. If you can get meetings, pipe takes care of itself."

This isn't theory. One prioritization sprint using this approach helped an SDR team hit 75% of their monthly meeting quota in a single day.

Here's exactly how it works.


The Problem: "Warm Accounts" Don't Pay the Bills​

Most ABM programs are built around a version of the same pitch to sales: "We've identified accounts showing intent. These accounts are warm. Go work them."

Sounds reasonable. But here's what actually happens:

  1. Marketing hands over a list of "warm" accounts based on engagement scores, intent data, or some weighted model
  2. Sales looks at the list and shrugs β€” "Great, but who do I call? What do I say? Why should they take my meeting?"
  3. The list sits in a spreadsheet while reps go back to working their own pipeline
  4. Marketing wonders why sales isn't "following up" on perfectly good accounts

The fundamental disconnect: salespeople don't care about warm accounts. They care about meetings. That's the unit of value in their world. Not an engagement score. Not an intent signal. A meeting on the calendar.

"If you optimize for pipe, it takes too long. If you can get meetings, they'll turn into pipe eventually. Sales will figure it out."

When this ABM leader stopped measuring success by "accounts showing engagement" and started measuring by "meetings booked," everything changed β€” not just the metrics, but how the entire GTM team operated.


The Three-Step ABM Machine​

The framework that emerged is deceptively simple. Three steps, executed with discipline every single week.

Step 1: Universe of Accounts, All Scored and Tiered by ICP Fit​

Before you can prioritize, you need to know your universe.

This starts with the classic funnel narrowing:

  • TAM (Total Addressable Market): Every company that could buy your product
  • SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market): The subset you can actually reach and serve
  • ICP Accounts: The companies that look like your best customers β€” right industry, right size, right tech stack, right buying patterns

Every account in your CRM should be scored and tiered by how closely they match your ICP. This isn't a one-time exercise. It's a living model that gets updated as you learn what "good" actually looks like from your closed-won deals.

Why this matters for meetings: You can't prioritize who's most likely to book if you haven't already established who's worth booking with. The ICP tier is your foundation β€” it tells you which meetings are worth chasing and which ones are just activity for activity's sake.

Most teams have this step done (or think they do). The real magic happens in Steps 2 and 3.

Step 2: Weekly Prioritization of People Most Likely to Book a Meeting​

This is where the framework gets sharp.

Every week, the ABM team runs a prioritization sprint. Not on accounts β€” on people. Specific humans at specific companies who are showing signals that they're likely to take a meeting right now.

The signal stack has two layers:

Contact-level signals (signals about the person):

  • Intent data engagement β€” Are they personally researching your category or related topics?
  • Web visitor identification β€” Have they visited your site? Which pages? How many times?
  • Hiring manager activity β€” Are they hiring for roles that suggest they need your solution?
  • Job changer signals β€” Did they recently move to a new company? (Champions in new seats are gold.)
  • Email engagement β€” Are they opening and clicking your emails? Replying?

Account-level signals (signals about the company):

  • Review site intent β€” Is the company actively evaluating solutions on G2, TrustRadius, etc.?
  • News and trigger events β€” Funding rounds, leadership changes, expansion announcements, regulatory shifts
  • Engagement scores β€” Overall account-level interaction with your brand across channels
  • Digital projects and initiatives β€” Are they launching projects that create a need for what you sell?

The output of this weekly sprint isn't a warm account list. It's what we call the MLTBM list β€” "Most Likely to Book a Meeting." A ranked set of 15–20 specific contacts per rep, each with concise "reasons to reach out now" and AI-driven outbound cadences matched to their specific behavior and account context.

This is the key shift. You're not telling sales "this account is warm." You're telling them "this person, at this company, is showing these specific behaviors, and here's the play to get them on the phone."

Step 3: Surround Sound Micro Campaigns​

Once you know who to target and why, you hit them from every angle.

"Surround sound" means the contact sees your brand across multiple channels in a compressed timeframe β€” not with generic brand awareness, but with specific, relevant messaging tied to the exact signal they're showing.

Here's what that looks like in practice:

  • Someone researching your category on review sites? β†’ Email with a comparison guide + LinkedIn connection + retargeting ads featuring customer proof points
  • A champion who just changed jobs? β†’ Congratulatory LinkedIn message + personalized email referencing their previous experience with your solution + phone call from their aligned rep
  • A hiring manager posting roles that suggest they need your product? β†’ Email about how your solution reduces the need for that hire + LinkedIn content about the business case + direct mail if warranted
  • A contact who visited your pricing page twice this week? β†’ Immediate phone call + email with an ROI calculator + chatbot engagement on next visit

The key word is micro. These aren't broad campaigns blasting the same message to 500 accounts. They're tight, 1-to-few plays targeting 10–20 contacts per sprint with highly specific messaging.

The channels: email, LinkedIn, phone, social, direct mail, ads, chatbot β€” whatever combination makes sense for the signal. The point is that when the contact is ready to engage, your brand is already everywhere they look.


Why This Works: The Meeting Math​

Let's break down why optimizing for meetings is fundamentally different from optimizing for warm accounts.

The warm account approach:

  1. Score accounts β†’ 2. Declare them "warm" β†’ 3. Hand to sales β†’ 4. Hope for meetings β†’ 5. Eventually, maybe, pipeline

The meeting-first approach:

  1. Score and tier accounts β†’ 2. Identify specific people showing booking signals β†’ 3. Run surround sound plays β†’ 4. Book meetings β†’ 5. Pipeline follows naturally

The difference isn't just semantic. It changes:

  • What you measure: Meeting conversion rate per signal type, not "account engagement score"
  • How you talk to sales: "Here are 15 people who are likely to book this week and why" vs. "Here are 50 warm accounts"
  • What campaigns you build: Specific micro-plays per signal vs. broad nurture tracks
  • How fast you iterate: Weekly sprints vs. quarterly campaign reviews

And the results speak for themselves. That 75%-of-monthly-quota-in-one-day stat wasn't a fluke. It was the natural outcome of giving SDRs a pre-prioritized list of people who were already showing signals that they wanted to talk.

"The old way was 'the accounts say we're warm now.' But salespeople don't care about warm accounts. They want meetings. The moment I shifted to giving them meetings instead of warm accounts, everything got easier."


The Signal Stack: Building Your "Most Likely to Book" List​

Let's go deeper on how to actually build this signal stack, because this is where execution separates the top ABM programs from everyone else.

Layer 1: Contact Signals (The Person)​

Signal TypeWhat It Tells YouMeeting Likelihood
Web visitor (pricing/demo pages)Active evaluationπŸ”΄ Very High
Job changer (champion at new company)New budget, known advocateπŸ”΄ Very High
Email reply or click-throughDirect engagement🟠 High
Intent data (category research)Early-stage evaluation🟑 Medium-High
Hiring for relevant rolesBuilding the team = building the need🟑 Medium
Social engagement (likes, comments)Awareness, not yet active🟒 Medium-Low

Layer 2: Account Signals (The Company)​

Signal TypeWhat It Tells YouMeeting Likelihood
Review site activity (G2, etc.)Actively comparing solutionsπŸ”΄ Very High
Funding/expansion newsBudget unlocked🟠 High
Engagement score spikeMulti-threaded interest🟠 High
Digital project announcementsCreates a trigger need🟑 Medium-High
Leadership changeNew priorities, new budget🟑 Medium
Industry regulation changeCompliance-driven urgency🟑 Medium

The combination is what matters. A contact showing intent data signals at an account with a spiking engagement score is exponentially more likely to book than either signal alone.

Your weekly sprint should stack-rank contacts by combined signal strength β€” the people at the best-fit accounts showing the most buying behavior right now.


Signal Alpha: The Niche Signals That Only Matter to You​

Here's where the best ABM machines separate themselves from everyone else.

Most signals β€” intent data, job changes, funding rounds β€” are available to every competitor in your space. They're valuable, but they're not unique. Everyone is tracking the same triggers and hitting the same contacts at the same time.

Signal Alpha is the unique advantage you get from niche signals β€” the one or two signals that translate directly to intent for your business alone, because only you understand why they matter.

Think about it:

  • If you sell observability software, your best customers are companies with spikes in "tech stack complexity." A job posting for a Snowflake Engineer signals the company is investing in data infrastructure, which means their stack is getting more complex, which means they need your product. That hiring signal is meaningless to 99% of vendors β€” but it's gold for you.

  • If you sell EHS compliance software, a job posting mentioning "ISO 14001" or "OSHA reporting" at a manufacturing company means they're investing in safety infrastructure. Run ads and outreach talking about how you consolidate compliance across frameworks. Nobody else is tracking that signal.

  • If you sell cloud fax to healthcare systems, a hospital posting for a "HIPAA Compliance Officer" or announcing an Epic migration signals they're modernizing infrastructure. That's your moment.

  • If you sell sales intelligence, companies with a recent increase in the number of ads running across channels might signal they're scaling GTM β€” and struggling with targeting. That's a signal only you care about.

The formula: Find the niche signal β†’ build messaging specifically against it β†’ run outbound + ads to contacts showing that signal.

These niche signals won't appear in any intent data vendor's dashboard. You have to figure them out yourself, based on deep understanding of your best customers' buying journeys. But when you find them, they're devastating β€” because your competitors aren't tracking them, your messaging is hyper-relevant, and your timing is perfect.

How to find your Signal Alpha:

  1. Interview your 5 best customers: "What was happening at your company when you decided to buy?"
  2. Look for patterns β€” was there a hiring wave? A new project? A compliance deadline? A tech migration?
  3. Figure out where that signal shows up publicly (job boards, news, press releases, LinkedIn)
  4. Build tracking for it and add it to your MLTBM prioritization model
  5. Test outbound against it for 2-4 weeks and measure meeting conversion

The best ABM teams aren't just tracking the obvious signals. They're finding the weird, specific, nobody-else-cares-about-this signals that perfectly predict buying intent for their unique product. That's Signal Alpha.


From Weekly to Daily: Accelerating the Playbook​

The enterprise ABM leader who pioneered this framework ran it on a weekly cadence. Weekly prioritization sprints. Weekly campaign launches. Weekly measurement.

But here's the thing about signals: they decay fast. The contact who hit your pricing page on Monday is a hot lead on Tuesday and a cold one by Friday. The job changer who started their new role this morning is most reachable today, not next week.

The logical evolution of this framework is a daily MLTBM playbook β€” the same "most likely to book a meeting" logic, but refreshed every single day, with your Signal Alpha signals baked in.

Imagine this:

Every morning, your SDR team opens a dashboard that shows them exactly who to call, email, and connect with on LinkedIn today β€” ranked by signal strength, with the specific signals listed next to each contact. No research required. No guessing. Just execute.

That's what the daily version of this framework looks like:

  • Web visitor identification feeds you the contact signals in real-time β€” who visited, which pages, how many times
  • Intent data integrations surface contacts actively researching your category
  • The daily playbook is the weekly "most likely to book" list, but regenerated every 24 hours with fresh signal data
  • Multi-channel execution (email + phone + social) is the surround sound campaign, orchestrated from a single platform

This is exactly the approach signal-based selling was built around β€” narrowing your total addressable market to a daily set of prioritized contacts based on live buying signals. And it's the same philosophy behind the ABM frameworks that actually work in practice.

How MarketBetter Makes This Operational​

This three-step ABM machine β€” ICP-tiered accounts, signal-based prioritization, surround sound execution β€” is powerful as a framework. But running it manually is brutal. The weekly sprint alone can eat 4–6 hours of an ABM leader's time, and by the time you've finished prioritizing, the freshest signals are already stale.

MarketBetter was purpose-built to operationalize this exact playbook:

  • Visitor identification captures web visitor signals automatically β€” you know exactly who's hitting your site and which pages they care about
  • The Daily Playbook is your "most likely to book" list, regenerated every day with stacked contact and account signals, so your team always knows who to prioritize
  • Email automation and the smart dialer let your reps execute surround sound campaigns across email and phone from a single screen β€” no tab-switching, no manual logging
  • AI chatbot engages returning visitors in real-time, converting "pricing page visit" signals into live conversations before the contact bounces

Instead of a weekly manual sprint, MarketBetter runs the signal stack continuously and serves up the prioritized output to your reps every morning. The framework stays the same. The execution becomes instant.


Putting It Into Practice: Your First Week​

If you want to test this approach before committing to any tooling, here's a manual version you can run starting Monday:

Day 1 (Monday): Build Your Signal Stack

  • Pull your ICP-tiered account list from your CRM
  • Layer in any intent data you have access to
  • Check your website analytics for visitor signals from target accounts
  • Scan LinkedIn for job changers and new hires at target accounts
  • Review email engagement data from the past 30 days

Day 2 (Tuesday): Run Your First Prioritization Sprint

  • Stack-rank contacts by combined signal strength
  • Select your top 15–20 "most likely to book" contacts
  • For each contact, document the specific signal(s) driving prioritization
  • Share the list with your SDR team β€” not as "warm accounts," but as "here's who to call and why"

Days 3–5 (Wednesday–Friday): Execute Surround Sound

  • Each prioritized contact gets touched across at least 3 channels
  • Messaging is tied to the specific signal (not generic outreach)
  • Track meetings booked, not just activities completed

End of Week: Measure and Iterate

  • How many meetings did the prioritized list generate?
  • Which signal types converted best?
  • What channels drove the most responses?
  • Feed learnings back into next week's sprint

You'll likely see results in the first sprint. The ABM leader who built this system saw it immediately:

"We ran the first prioritization sprint and handed the list to the SDR team. They hit 75% of their monthly meeting quota that day. That's when I knew we were onto something."


The Bottom Line​

The best ABM programs in the world aren't optimizing for "warm accounts." They're optimizing for meetings.

The framework is three steps:

  1. Build your universe β€” every account scored and tiered by ICP fit
  2. Prioritize people, not accounts β€” weekly (or daily) sprints to identify who's most likely to book, based on stacked contact and account signals
  3. Execute surround sound β€” micro campaigns across every channel, driven by specific signals, compressed into tight windows

The mindset shift is simple but profound: stop telling sales that accounts are warm. Start getting them meetings.

If you can get meetings, pipeline takes care of itself. Sales will figure it out.


Ready to turn your signal stack into a daily meeting machine? See how MarketBetter operationalizes this exact playbook β†’