Skip to main content

4 posts tagged with "gong"

View All Tags

7 Best Gong Alternatives 2026: Cheaper Conversation Intelligence & SDR Platforms

ยท 8 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

Gong is the category leader in conversation intelligence for good reason โ€” 6,470+ G2 reviews, 4.7/5 rating, and genuinely deep call analytics.

But at $5,000+ platform fees, $1,300-$1,600/user/year, and $15,000-$65,000 implementation costs, Gong's pricing pushes many B2B sales teams to look for alternatives. Whether you want cheaper conversation intelligence, a broader SDR platform, or both โ€” here are 7 alternatives worth evaluating.

Quick Comparisonโ€‹

ToolBest ForStarting PriceFree PlanG2 Rating
MarketBetterFull SDR workflow + pipeline generation$500/mo (3 seats)No (trial available)4.97/5
tl;dvBudget-friendly meeting intelligenceFree / $19/user/moโœ… Yes4.7/5
AvomaMid-market CI + coaching$49/user/moโœ… Yes (limited)4.6/5
Chorus (ZoomInfo)CI bundled with prospecting dataIncluded with ZoomInfoโŒ No4.5/5
Clari CopilotRevenue intelligence + forecastingContact salesโŒ No4.5/5
JiminnySales team coaching + collaboration~$85/user/moโŒ No4.6/5
Fireflies.aiAI meeting transcription at scaleFree / $18/user/moโœ… Yes4.5/5

1. MarketBetter โ€” Best for Teams That Need Pipeline, Not Just Analyticsโ€‹

Starting price: $500/month (3 SDR seats)

Why it's different: MarketBetter isn't a Gong clone. It solves the problem that comes before conversation intelligence โ€” generating the pipeline that creates conversations worth analyzing.

What you get:

  • Website visitor identification โ€” know which companies are on your site right now
  • Daily SDR playbook โ€” AI-prioritized task list telling each rep who to contact and why
  • Email sequences โ€” hyper-personalized outbound at scale
  • Smart dialer โ€” built-in calling (call recording included)
  • AI chatbot โ€” engages website visitors instantly
  • Champion tracking โ€” alerts when contacts change jobs

Why teams choose it over Gong: Gong analyzes conversations after they happen. MarketBetter generates the conversations in the first place. For teams where the bottleneck is "we don't have enough pipeline" rather than "we're losing deals we should win," MarketBetter delivers more ROI per dollar.

Cost comparison: MarketBetter's Growth plan ($1,500/mo for 5 seats = $18,000/yr) costs less than Gong alone ($28K+ Year 1 for 5 users) and includes prospecting, email, dialer, chatbot, and visitor ID โ€” tools that would cost an additional $40K-100K/year on top of Gong.

Honest limitation: MarketBetter doesn't offer Gong-level conversation analysis, deal risk scoring, or systematic rep coaching based on call patterns. If those are your primary needs, it's not a direct replacement.

Book a demo โ†’


2. tl;dv โ€” Best Budget Alternative for Meeting Intelligenceโ€‹

Starting price: Free (Pro: $19/user/mo, Business: $59/user/mo, Enterprise: $99/user/mo)

Why it works: tl;dv delivers 80% of what most teams actually use Gong for โ€” recording meetings, transcribing them, and extracting key moments โ€” at 5-10% of the cost.

What you get:

  • AI meeting recording and transcription
  • Automatic summaries and action items
  • CRM auto-updates (HubSpot, Salesforce)
  • Speaker analytics and talk-time tracking
  • Multi-meeting intelligence (trend analysis across calls)

Why teams switch from Gong: The most common Gong usage pattern is "expensive recording tool." If your team records calls and occasionally reviews transcripts but doesn't run systematic coaching programs, tl;dv delivers equivalent value for $19-99/user/month vs Gong's $133-250/user/month plus platform fees.

Honest limitation: tl;dv lacks Gong's depth on deal intelligence, competitive mention tracking, and forecast-grade pipeline analytics. It's a meeting tool, not a revenue platform.


3. Avoma โ€” Best Mid-Market CI with Coaching Built Inโ€‹

Starting price: Free (limited) / $49/user/mo (Starter) / $79/user/mo (Business)

Why it works: Avoma bundles conversation intelligence, AI scheduling, live coaching cues, and revenue intelligence into a single platform at roughly one-third of Gong's per-user cost.

What you get:

  • AI meeting recording and transcription
  • Live coaching cues during calls (battle cards, objection prompts)
  • Revenue intelligence and deal tracking
  • AI scheduling and meeting management
  • CRM integration and auto-fill

Why teams choose it over Gong: Avoma's pricing is transparent and self-serve. There's no $5K+ platform fee, no implementation charge, and no multi-year lock required. For teams of 10-30 reps, the savings are substantial โ€” $47,400/year for 15 users on Avoma Business vs $54,000+ Year 1 on Gong Professional.

Honest limitation: Avoma's market share and ecosystem are significantly smaller than Gong's. Some enterprise integrations (Salesforce CPQ, custom BI tools) may not be as mature.


4. Chorus by ZoomInfo โ€” Best If You Already Use ZoomInfoโ€‹

Starting price: Included with ZoomInfo subscription

Why it works: If you're already paying for ZoomInfo's prospecting data ($15K-50K/year depending on plan), Chorus conversation intelligence may be bundled at no additional cost. That makes it effectively free.

What you get:

  • Conversation recording and transcription
  • Deal intelligence and momentum tracking
  • Relationship intelligence (stakeholder mapping)
  • ZoomInfo intent data + prospecting data in same platform

Why teams choose it over Gong: No incremental cost if you're a ZoomInfo customer. The integration between prospecting data and conversation intelligence in a single platform eliminates tool-switching.

Honest limitation: Since ZoomInfo acquired Chorus, development focus has arguably shifted. Some reviewers note Chorus hasn't kept pace with Gong's AI capabilities. And if you're not already a ZoomInfo customer, the combined cost may exceed Gong.


5. Clari Copilot (formerly Wingman) โ€” Best for Revenue Forecastingโ€‹

Starting price: Contact sales

Why it works: Clari acquired Wingman and rebranded it as Clari Copilot, combining real-time call coaching with Clari's industry-leading revenue forecasting. If your primary pain is forecast accuracy rather than rep coaching, this combination is compelling.

What you get:

  • Real-time battle cards and coaching prompts during live calls
  • Revenue forecasting (Clari's core strength)
  • Deal inspection and pipeline analytics
  • Conversation intelligence and call analysis

Why teams choose it over Gong: Clari's forecasting engine is widely considered superior to Gong Forecast. If your CRO's biggest headache is forecast accuracy and pipeline predictability, Clari Copilot addresses both conversation intelligence and forecasting in one vendor relationship.

Honest limitation: Pricing is opaque (enterprise sales process required). The combined Clari + Copilot stack may cost as much as Gong for large teams.


6. Jiminny โ€” Best for Sales Team Coaching Cultureโ€‹

Starting price: ~$85/user/mo

Why it works: Jiminny focuses specifically on building coaching cultures within sales teams. Instead of just surfacing data, it structures coaching workflows โ€” playlists of best calls, coaching scorecards, team leaderboards, and structured 1:1 templates.

What you get:

  • Conversation recording and transcription
  • Coaching playlists and scorecards
  • Team collaboration (comment, share, learn from calls)
  • Deal intelligence and pipeline tracking
  • Integrations with major CRMs

Why teams choose it over Gong: Jiminny costs roughly 40-50% less than Gong per user and focuses specifically on the coaching workflow that many Gong customers actually want. If your goal is "help managers coach reps better," Jiminny is purpose-built for that.

Honest limitation: Smaller market presence means fewer third-party integrations and a thinner ecosystem compared to Gong's extensive partner network.


7. Fireflies.ai โ€” Best for AI Transcription at Massive Scaleโ€‹

Starting price: Free (Pro: $18/user/mo, Business: $29/user/mo)

Why it works: Fireflies.ai is the simplest option on this list. It records meetings, transcribes them with high accuracy, generates summaries, and pushes them to your CRM. No deal intelligence, no forecasting โ€” just excellent transcription at an accessible price.

What you get:

  • AI meeting recording and transcription
  • Automatic summaries and action items
  • CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot, and others)
  • Conversation intelligence (topic tracking, sentiment)
  • Custom AI apps on top of meeting data

Why teams choose it over Gong: Price and simplicity. Fireflies at $18-29/user/month vs Gong at $133-250/user/month is a 5-10x savings for teams that primarily need transcription and summaries.

Honest limitation: No deal intelligence, no forecasting, limited coaching features. It's a transcription tool with some analytics, not a revenue intelligence platform.


How to Choose: Decision Frameworkโ€‹

You need pipeline generation (not just analytics)โ€‹

โ†’ MarketBetter โ€” solves the "who do I call?" problem before it becomes a "why did I lose?" problem

You want Gong-like features at 70% less costโ€‹

โ†’ tl;dv (basic CI) or Avoma (full CI + coaching)

You already pay for ZoomInfoโ€‹

โ†’ Chorus โ€” may be free with your existing contract

You care most about forecastingโ€‹

โ†’ Clari Copilot โ€” best-in-class revenue prediction

You want to build a coaching cultureโ€‹

โ†’ Jiminny โ€” purpose-built for structured coaching

You just need transcriptionโ€‹

โ†’ Fireflies.ai โ€” simple, cheap, effective


The Bigger Questionโ€‹

Before choosing a Gong alternative, ask whether conversation intelligence is actually your highest-priority investment.

If your SDRs are saying "I don't have enough qualified prospects," no amount of call analytics will fix that. The problem isn't how reps handle conversations โ€” it's that they don't have enough conversations to begin with.

For pipeline-starved teams, tools like MarketBetter that generate and prioritize leads deliver more measurable ROI than tools that analyze calls after the fact.

For teams with healthy pipeline and a conversion rate problem, Gong or its alternatives make more sense.

Match the tool to the problem, not the category.

Book a MarketBetter demo โ†’


Related reads:

Gong Pricing Breakdown 2026: What You'll Actually Pay (Platform Fees, Per-User Costs, Hidden Charges)

ยท 7 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

Gong doesn't publish pricing on their website. You have to "request a demo" just to learn what it costs. That alone should tell you something.

After analyzing dozens of data points from Vendr negotiations, G2 buyer reports, and SaaS benchmarking platforms, here's what Gong actually costs in 2026 โ€” and why the sticker price is just the beginning.

Gong's Pricing Structure: Three Cost Layersโ€‹

Unlike most modern SaaS tools with transparent per-seat pricing, Gong uses a three-layer pricing model that makes budgeting complex:

Layer 1: Platform Fee (Mandatory)โ€‹

Before you add a single user, you pay a platform fee just for access to the infrastructure:

Team SizeAnnual Platform FeeMonthly Equivalent
1-20 users$5,000/year~$417/mo
21-50 users$10,000/year~$833/mo
51-100 users$20,000/year~$1,667/mo
100+ users$25,000-$50,000/year~$2,083-$4,167/mo

This fee exists regardless of how many licenses you purchase. For a 10-person SDR team, you're paying $500/user/year before any actual licenses.

Layer 2: Per-User Licensesโ€‹

Per-user costs vary based on modules selected, team size, and negotiation leverage:

PlanAnnual Per-User CostMonthly EquivalentWhat's Included
Foundation~$1,200-$1,440/user/yr~$100-$120/moCall recording, transcription, basic analytics
Professional~$1,600-$1,920/user/yr~$133-$160/mo+ Deal intelligence, coaching insights
Bundled (Engage + Forecast)~$2,400-$3,000/user/yr~$200-$250/mo+ Email sequences, forecasting, full platform

Sources indicate Gong's average selling price has shifted from ~$160/user/month in 2023 to ~$200-250/user/month in 2025-2026 as they push bundled packages that include their Engage (outreach) and Forecast modules.

Layer 3: Implementation & Onboardingโ€‹

Team SizeTypical Implementation CostTimeline
Under 20 users$15,000-$25,0004-6 weeks
20-50 users$25,000-$40,0006-10 weeks
50-100 users$40,000-$65,0008-12 weeks
100+ users$50,000+10-16 weeks

This is a one-time cost, but it meaningfully inflates first-year total cost of ownership. Some sources report implementation fees as high as $65,000 for complex enterprise deployments.

Real-World Cost Scenariosโ€‹

Scenario 1: Small SDR Team (5 Users)โ€‹

Cost ComponentAnnual Cost
Platform fee$5,000
5 user licenses (Professional @ $1,600/user)$8,000
Implementation$15,000
Year 1 Total$28,000
Year 2 Total (w/ 10% uplift, no impl.)$14,300
Effective Year 1 per-user/month$467
Effective Year 2 per-user/month$238

Scenario 2: Mid-Size Sales Team (15 Users)โ€‹

Cost ComponentAnnual Cost
Platform fee$5,000
15 user licenses (Professional @ $1,600/user)$24,000
Implementation$25,000
Year 1 Total$54,000
Year 2 Total (w/ 10% uplift)$31,900
Effective Year 1 per-user/month$300

Scenario 3: Enterprise Team (50 Users, Bundled)โ€‹

Cost ComponentAnnual Cost
Platform fee$10,000
50 user licenses (Bundled @ $2,400/user)$120,000
Implementation$40,000
Year 1 Total$170,000
Year 2 Total (w/ 10% uplift)$143,000
3-Year Total$470,300

Scenario 4: The "Full Stack" Costโ€‹

Gong is conversation intelligence. To run outbound SDR operations, you still need:

Additional ToolTypical Annual Cost
Prospecting data (ZoomInfo/Apollo)$12,000-$30,000
Email sequencing (Outreach/SalesLoft)$15,000-$25,000
Website visitor ID (Warmly/6sense)$10,000-$40,000
Dialer (standalone)$3,000-$8,000
Additional stack cost$40,000-$103,000/yr

A 15-person SDR team running Gong plus a complete outbound stack easily spends $70,000-$130,000 annually โ€” and that's before CRM costs.

Hidden Costs & Contract Gotchasโ€‹

1. Auto-Renewal Uplifts (5-15% annually)โ€‹

Gong contracts typically include automatic price increases of 5-15% at renewal. A $29,000/year contract becomes $31,900 in Year 2 and $35,090 in Year 3 without any additional users.

2. Multi-Year Lock-Insโ€‹

Gong sales reps push 2-3 year contracts for "better per-user pricing." This means committing $90K+ before you know if your team will adopt it.

3. Early Termination Penalties (50-100%)โ€‹

If Gong isn't working and you want out mid-contract, expect to pay 50-100% of the remaining contract value as a termination fee. A $29K/year contract with 18 months remaining could cost $21,750-$43,500 just to leave.

4. License Underutilizationโ€‹

Per Oliv.ai's analysis of 600+ Gong reviews, companies commonly buy 110 licenses with only 50 active users. Those inactive licenses still cost $133-$250/user/month. Your effective cost-per-active-user could be double the quoted price.

5. Forced Bundlingโ€‹

Gong is increasingly pushing bundled packages that include Engage and Forecast modules. If you only need conversation intelligence, you may still end up paying for outreach and forecasting features you don't use.

6. No Free Trial (Really)โ€‹

Gong technically offers a "trial" โ€” but only after going through their sales process. There's no self-serve sandbox. One review summed it up: "You don't find out what it actually feels like until you're locked in."

How Gong Compares to Alternatives on Priceโ€‹

ToolStarting PriceWhat's IncludedFree Trial
Gong$5K platform + $1,300/user/yrConversation intelligence onlyโŒ Sales-gated
MarketBetter$500/mo (3 seats)Visitor ID + email + dialer + chatbot + playbookโœ… Yes
Chorus (ZoomInfo)Included with ZoomInfoConversation intelligence + prospecting dataโŒ Bundled
tl;dvFree (basic) / $19-$99/user/moAI meeting notes + coachingโœ… Free tier
Avoma$49/user/moCI + coaching + schedulingโœ… Free tier
Oliv.ai$19-$99/user/moCI + forecasting + coachingโœ… Yes

The gap is stark. Gong's Year 1 cost for 5 users ($28,000) exceeds MarketBetter's annual Growth plan ($18,000) which includes visitor ID, email sequences, a smart dialer, and an AI chatbot โ€” none of which Gong offers.

Who Should Pay Gong Prices?โ€‹

Gong is worth its pricing if:

  • You're 100+ reps and conversation patterns across hundreds of calls reveal coaching insights that meaningfully move close rates
  • You have a dedicated enablement team that will build systematic coaching programs around Gong's data (not just use it as a recording tool)
  • Your deals are $50K+ ACV with 6-12 month cycles where tracking conversation signals across multiple stakeholders prevents losses worth 10x the Gong investment
  • You've already solved pipeline generation โ€” your reps have plenty of opportunities, the problem is conversion

Who Should Look Elsewhere?โ€‹

Skip Gong if:

  • You're under 20 SDRs โ€” the platform fee alone is $250-500/user/year before licenses
  • You need pipeline, not analytics โ€” Gong can't help reps who don't have enough conversations to analyze
  • You want transparency โ€” if opaque pricing and multi-year locks frustrate you, Gong's buying experience won't improve post-purchase
  • You'd use it as a recording tool โ€” paying $250/user/month for a meeting recorder is expensive when tl;dv, Otter.ai, and Fireflies.ai offer that for free or near-free

The Bottom Lineโ€‹

Gong is genuinely excellent at conversation intelligence. The 4.7/5 G2 rating from 6,470+ reviews is earned.

But the pricing model is designed to extract maximum enterprise revenue, not to deliver value at accessible price points. Between platform fees, per-user costs, implementation charges, multi-year locks, and auto-renewal uplifts, you're looking at $28K-$170K+ in Year 1 depending on team size โ€” for a tool that only covers one piece of the sales workflow.

For most B2B sales teams building their outbound engine, that money goes further invested in tools that generate pipeline, not just analyze it.

See what $500/month gets you at MarketBetter โ†’


Related reads:

Gong Review 2026: What 6,000+ Users Really Think (Honest Analysis)

ยท 7 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

Gong has 6,470+ reviews on G2 with a 4.7/5 rating. That's impressive. But ratings don't tell you whether Gong is right for your team, at your budget, for your problems.

We dug through hundreds of G2 reviews, Reddit threads, TrustRadius feedback, and competitor analyses to surface the patterns that matter. Here's what users actually say โ€” the good, the bad, and the expensive.

What Gong Does Well (According to Users)โ€‹

1. Call Recording and Transcription Are Best-in-Classโ€‹

This is Gong's foundation, and users consistently praise it. The transcription accuracy is high, the interface for reviewing calls is clean, and the ability to search across all recorded conversations is genuinely useful.

Common G2 praise: "Finding specific moments in calls takes seconds instead of re-watching entire recordings."

For sales managers who previously relied on reps self-reporting what happened on calls, Gong eliminates the guesswork. You see exactly what was said, by whom, and when.

2. Deal Intelligence Surfaces Real Risksโ€‹

Users managing complex enterprise deals with multiple stakeholders cite Gong's deal board as a standout feature. It tracks engagement across contacts, flags deals where key stakeholders have gone silent, and identifies patterns that predict outcomes.

Why it works: In a 6-month B2B deal with 8 stakeholders, tracking who said what across 15 calls is humanly impossible. Gong makes it automatic.

3. Coaching Gets Specificโ€‹

Instead of generic "you need to ask more questions" coaching, Gong gives managers specific data points โ€” talk-to-listen ratios, competitor mention patterns, next-step language, objection handling frequency. Some reviewers say this transformed their coaching programs from subjective to data-driven.

4. Competitive Intelligence From Actual Conversationsโ€‹

Gong tracks when competitors are mentioned in prospect conversations. Sales leaders use this to understand which competitors show up most often, what objections they trigger, and how their reps handle competitive situations. This is genuinely hard to get elsewhere.

What Users Complain About (The Consistent Themes)โ€‹

1. The Price Is Brutal for Small-to-Mid Teamsโ€‹

This is the single most common complaint across every review platform. Here's a representative sample:

G2 reviewer: "The cost is a significant barrier. For a 15-rep team, we're looking at nearly $30K/year before onboarding."

Reddit user: "Gong quoted us $5K platform fee plus $1,600/user/year for 10 users. That's $21K/year just for call recording and analytics."

For context: That $21K/year covers conversation intelligence only. You still need separate tools for prospecting, email outreach, website identification, and dialing. Total SDR stack cost with Gong easily exceeds $50K/year for a 10-person team.

Our take: Gong's pricing makes sense at 50+ reps where the per-user cost drops and the coaching insights scale. Under 20 reps, the math is hard to justify unless your ACV is $50K+.

2. No Self-Serve Trial (And It Feels Intentional)โ€‹

Multiple reviewers flag that Gong won't let you try the product without going through a full sales process. One tl;dv analysis put it bluntly:

"You don't find out what it actually feels like until you're locked in. There's no sandbox, no click-to-start. Just a form, a follow-up, and a BDR who wants to know if you have budget."

This matters because several reviewers report that what looked great in a demo didn't translate to daily usage. Reps found the interface overwhelming, managers didn't build coaching habits around it, and the tool became an expensive recording device.

3. Adoption Is a Real Challengeโ€‹

This shows up in review after review: the product is powerful, but getting reps to actually use it requires significant effort.

Oliv.ai's analysis of 600+ reviews: Companies commonly buy 110 licenses with only 50 active users, treating Gong as a note-taker and paying $250/user for minimal value.

The onboarding process requires dedicated internal training, and Gong's workflow is opinionated โ€” it pushes its process, not yours. Teams without a RevOps or enablement function to drive adoption often underutilize it.

4. It Can Feel Surveillance-Heavyโ€‹

This is the uncomfortable truth about conversation intelligence platforms. Multiple users describe a "Big Brother" dynamic:

Reddit thread: "Some reps push back because they feel monitored. Talk time tracking, keyword scoring, objection handling analysis โ€” it's useful data for managers but can create a weird culture."

Some reviewers report PIPs (performance improvement plans) being built using Gong data, which is efficient for management but toxic for rep morale if not handled carefully.

5. Multi-Year Contract Locks and Auto-Renewal Trapsโ€‹

Users on G2 and TrustRadius flag contract issues:

  • Multi-year commitments pushed by sales reps for "better pricing"
  • Auto-renewal uplifts of 5-15% annually โ€” your Year 2 price is higher even if you do nothing
  • Early termination penalties of 50-100% of remaining contract value
  • Forced bundling of Engage and Forecast modules you may not want

TrustRadius reviewer: "We signed a 3-year deal. By Year 2, we realized we were only using 60% of the features, but getting out would cost more than staying."

Who Gong Works Best For (Based on Reviews)โ€‹

The happiest Gong users share these characteristics:

  1. 50+ rep teams where per-user costs amortize and patterns emerge across hundreds of calls
  2. Dedicated enablement staff who build systematic coaching programs, not just watch recordings
  3. Enterprise deals ($50K+ ACV) where tracking multi-stakeholder conversations over months prevents losses worth 10x the investment
  4. Existing pipeline โ€” reps have plenty of conversations to analyze, and the problem is conversion rate, not volume

Who Should Think Twiceโ€‹

Based on negative reviews and complaints, these teams struggle with Gong:

  1. Under 20 reps โ€” the platform fee alone pushes per-user costs to unsustainable levels
  2. Pipeline-starved teams โ€” you can't analyze conversations that aren't happening
  3. No enablement function โ€” without someone driving adoption, Gong becomes a $2K/user/year recording tool
  4. Price-sensitive organizations โ€” if $30K-100K/year for one piece of your sales stack causes budget stress, the ROI math is shaky
  5. Teams that value transparency โ€” if opaque pricing and multi-year locks bother you during the buying process, the vendor relationship won't improve after signing

Gong vs the Market in 2026โ€‹

The conversation intelligence market has shifted dramatically. When Gong launched in 2015, it was genuinely category-creating. In 2026:

  • tl;dv offers AI meeting transcription and coaching starting at $0/month
  • Avoma provides CI plus scheduling at $49/user/month
  • Oliv.ai delivers CI, forecasting, and coaching at $19-99/user/month
  • Chorus (now owned by ZoomInfo) bundles CI with prospecting data
  • MarketBetter approaches the problem from a completely different angle โ€” instead of analyzing past calls, it tells SDRs who to contact and what to say before the call happens, starting at $500/month for 3 seats

The question isn't "Is Gong good?" โ€” it is. The question is whether backward-looking conversation analytics is the best use of $30K-170K/year when forward-looking pipeline generation and SDR execution tools exist at a fraction of the price.

The Verdictโ€‹

Gong earns its 4.7/5 rating. The conversation intelligence engine is genuinely excellent. The deal tracking is valuable for enterprise sales teams. The coaching insights are specific and actionable when used systematically.

But the pricing model belongs to a different era. Platform fees, opaque per-user costs, multi-year locks, implementation charges, forced bundling, and auto-renewal uplifts create a total cost of ownership that's 3-5x what modern alternatives charge for comparable (and sometimes broader) functionality.

Score: 4.2/5 โ€” Excellent product, but the pricing and buying experience drag it down for anyone who isn't running a 50+ rep enterprise sales org.

If your problem is "my reps need more pipeline" โ€” Gong won't help. Look at tools that generate and prioritize leads, not tools that analyze past calls.

Book a MarketBetter demo โ†’


Related reads:

MarketBetter vs Gong: SDR Workflow Engine vs Conversation Intelligence [2026]

ยท 6 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai

If you're evaluating MarketBetter and Gong, you're probably asking the wrong question.

These tools solve fundamentally different problems. Gong tells you what happened in past sales conversations. MarketBetter tells your SDRs exactly who to contact, how to reach them, and what to say โ€” before the conversation even starts.

But budget constraints force the choice. Here's how they actually compare.

The Core Difference in 30 Secondsโ€‹

Gong records sales calls, transcribes them, and uses AI to surface patterns โ€” who talked more, what objections came up, which deals are at risk based on conversation signals. It's backward-looking intelligence.

MarketBetter identifies who's visiting your website, enriches those signals with intent data, and delivers a daily SDR playbook that tells reps exactly what to do. It's forward-looking execution.

CategoryMarketBetterGong
Primary functionSDR workflow + execution engineConversation recording + analysis
When it helpsBefore the callAfter the call
Core value"Here's who to call and what to say""Here's what happened on the call"
Website visitor IDโœ… Built-inโŒ Not available
Daily SDR playbookโœ… AI-generated prioritiesโŒ Not a feature
Call recordingโœ… Smart dialer includedโœ… Core feature
Email sequencesโœ… Hyper-personalizedโŒ Not a feature
AI chatbotโœ… Engages visitors liveโŒ Not a feature
Deal forecastingโŒ Not primary focusโœ… Revenue intelligence
Rep coachingโŒ Limitedโœ… Deep call analysis
Starting price$500/mo (3 seats)~$5,000 platform fee + $1,600/user/yr
Free trialโœ… AvailableโŒ Gated behind sales process

Where Gong Wins (And It Does Win)โ€‹

Let's be honest about where Gong excels:

Conversation Intelligenceโ€‹

Gong has 6,470+ G2 reviews and a 4.7/5 rating for a reason. Its call recording and analysis engine is best-in-class. If your primary problem is understanding why deals are won or lost, and coaching reps based on actual conversation patterns, Gong is hard to beat.

Deal Risk Scoringโ€‹

Gong tracks conversation signals across an entire deal cycle to predict which opportunities are at risk. If a champion mentions a competitor on the third call, Gong flags it. If a stakeholder who was engaged goes silent, Gong notices. For VP Sales running forecast calls, this intelligence is genuinely valuable.

Enterprise Sales Coachingโ€‹

Large sales organizations with dedicated enablement teams get real ROI from Gong's coaching features โ€” talk-to-listen ratios, objection handling patterns, competitor mention tracking, and next-step discipline analysis across hundreds of calls.

Where MarketBetter Winsโ€‹

The Top-of-Funnel Problem Gong Can't Solveโ€‹

Gong is useless until a conversation happens. If your SDRs don't know who to call, or they're spending hours researching prospects instead of selling, Gong can't help.

MarketBetter solves the "before the call" problem:

  • Website visitor identification reveals which companies are browsing your site right now
  • Intent signals show what pages they visited, how long they stayed, and what they're interested in
  • Daily playbook tells each SDR: "Call this person first, email this person second, here's what they care about"

Unified Outbound Executionโ€‹

With MarketBetter, your SDRs get email sequences, a smart dialer, an AI chatbot, and a daily prioritized task list in one platform. With Gong, you still need separate tools for:

  • Prospecting data (Apollo, ZoomInfo, or similar)
  • Email sequencing (Outreach, SalesLoft, or similar)
  • Website identification (Warmly, 6sense, or similar)
  • A dialer (separate purchase)

That "Gong + 4 other tools" stack costs $450-600/user/month. MarketBetter replaces most of that stack at $500/month flat for 3 seats.

Speed-to-Leadโ€‹

MarketBetter's AI chatbot engages website visitors the moment they arrive. The daily playbook ensures SDRs follow up with warm leads within hours, not days. According to MarketBetter's data, teams see 90% faster lead response times and 2x faster speed-to-lead.

Pricing: The Math That Mattersโ€‹

Gong Pricing (2026)โ€‹

Gong's pricing is intentionally opaque. Here's what industry sources confirm:

  • Platform fee: $5,000โ€“$50,000/year (mandatory, before any user licenses)
  • Per-user cost: $1,300โ€“$1,600/user/year ($108โ€“$133/user/month)
  • Bundled (with Engage + Forecast): Up to $250/user/month
  • Implementation: $15,000โ€“$65,000 one-time
  • Contract: Annual minimum, multi-year locks common
  • Auto-renewal uplift: 5โ€“15% annual increases
  • Early termination: 50โ€“100% penalty

Real-world costs for a 10-person SDR team:

  • Year 1: $10K platform + $16K licenses + $25K implementation = ~$51,000
  • Year 2: $10.5K platform + $17.6K licenses = ~$28,100
  • 3-year total: ~$107,200

And that's just for conversation intelligence. You still need prospecting, email, and dialer tools on top.

MarketBetter Pricing (2026)โ€‹

  • Starter ($500/mo): 3 SDR seats, website visitor ID, AI chatbot, 5K outbound actions
  • Growth ($1,500/mo): 5 seats, daily SDR playbook, 25K outbound actions, champion tracking
  • Scale ($3,000/mo): 10 seats, smart dialer, unlimited actions

Same 10-person SDR team on Scale:

  • Year 1: $36,000
  • Year 2: $36,000
  • 3-year total: $108,000 โ€” but includes prospecting, email, dialer, chatbot, and visitor ID

The MarketBetter 3-year cost roughly equals Gong's 3-year cost for conversation intelligence alone.

When to Choose Gongโ€‹

Choose Gong if:

  • Your SDRs already have enough pipeline โ€” the problem is closing, not opening
  • You have a dedicated sales enablement team that will build coaching programs around call data
  • You're enterprise-scale (100+ reps) and need deal forecasting across a complex pipeline
  • Your budget allows $30K+ annually on top of existing prospecting and outreach tools
  • You have a long, multi-stakeholder sales cycle where tracking conversation signals across 8-12 calls per deal drives real value

When to Choose MarketBetterโ€‹

Choose MarketBetter if:

  • Your top-of-funnel pipeline is the bottleneck โ€” SDRs don't have enough qualified prospects
  • You want one platform instead of a 4-5 tool stack
  • You're a small-to-mid-size team (3-30 SDRs) that can't afford enterprise pricing
  • Speed-to-lead matters โ€” you need to engage website visitors immediately
  • You want your SDRs spending time selling, not researching or figuring out who to call

Can You Use Both?โ€‹

Yes, and some teams do. MarketBetter fills the pipeline and tells SDRs who to call. Gong records those calls and helps coaches improve rep performance. It's a legitimate stack โ€” if your budget supports $60K+ annually for both.

But for most teams under $5M ARR, you need pipeline before you need conversation analytics. You can't analyze calls that never happen.

The Bottom Lineโ€‹

Gong is excellent at what it does: analyzing past conversations to improve future ones. But it's a rear-view mirror.

MarketBetter is the windshield. It shows you what's ahead โ€” who's interested, what they want, and exactly how to reach them.

If your SDRs are saying "I don't know who to call today," MarketBetter solves that problem. If they're saying "I'm losing deals I shouldn't be losing," Gong solves that one.

Most growing B2B teams have the first problem before the second.

Book a demo โ†’


Related reads: