Sendspark Alternative: Why Sales Teams Are Switching to MarketBetter
If you're searching for a Sendspark alternative, you're probably running into one of a few problems:
- You've hit the ceiling on how many personalized videos one person can record
- You're tired of switching between Sendspark and your email tool, your sequencer, your CRM, and your data provider
- You want personalization in the actual video — not just on the landing page
- You need video outreach that scales without proportional effort
These are the exact reasons sales teams are switching from Sendspark to MarketBetter. Not because Sendspark is bad — it's a solid video email tool. But because there's a fundamental difference between a video tool and a sales platform with AI video built in.
Let's break down the key reasons teams are making the switch.
Reason 1: AI Video Generation vs. Manual Recording
This is the single biggest difference.
Sendspark: You record every video yourself. Webcam, microphone, hit record, deliver the pitch, and hope you don't stumble. Each video takes 3-5 minutes. For 50 prospects, that's 2.5-4 hours of recording.
MarketBetter: AI avatars generate personalized videos for you. Choose an avatar (or upload your photo to create a custom one), write a dynamic script with personalization variables, and generate unique videos for every prospect on your list.
The math is simple:
- Sendspark: 10-20 personalized videos per day (realistic maximum)
- MarketBetter: Hundreds of personalized videos per day (automated)
For teams doing any kind of volume outreach, AI generation isn't a luxury — it's the only way to send personalized video to your entire pipeline.
And the quality doesn't drop. Video #500 has the same energy and polish as video #1. No fatigue, no off-takes, no bad lighting days.
For a deeper look at how this works, see our guide on how to personalize sales videos at scale without recording.
Reason 2: Personalization Is IN the Video
With Sendspark, you record a generic video and personalize the landing page — adding the prospect's name, company logo, and custom CTAs to the page where the video plays. The video itself is the same for everyone.
With MarketBetter, the personalization is in the video itself. The AI avatar literally speaks the prospect's name, mentions their company, and references their industry or specific challenges. Each prospect gets a video that was made for them — not a generic video on a customized page.
This is a meaningful difference in how prospects perceive the outreach:
Sendspark experience: Prospect clicks → lands on a page with their name → watches a video that says "Hi there, I wanted to reach out about your business."
MarketBetter experience: Prospect clicks → watches a video where the avatar says "Hi Sarah, I was looking at Acme Corp and noticed you're expanding into healthcare..."
The second experience feels dramatically more personal. It's the difference between a form letter with your name stamped on top and a letter that was actually written for you.
This level of personalization is what drives the 85% higher open rates and 3.2x more responses that teams report.
Reason 3: One Platform Instead of Five
Here's what a typical Sendspark-based tech stack looks like:
| Need | Tool |
|---|---|
| Video creation | Sendspark |
| Email sequencing | Outreach, Salesloft, or Apollo |
| Data enrichment | ZoomInfo, Clearbit, or Lusha |
| CRM | HubSpot or Salesforce |
| Analytics | Spread across all of the above |
That's 4-5 tools, 4-5 logins, 4-5 data silos, and countless integrations to manage.
MarketBetter consolidates this:
| Need | Tool |
|---|---|
| Video creation | MarketBetter (HeyGen integration) |
| Email sequencing | MarketBetter (Play Builder) |
| Data enrichment | MarketBetter (built-in) |
| CRM integration | MarketBetter (native connectors) |
| Visitor identification | MarketBetter (built-in) |
| Analytics | MarketBetter (unified dashboard) |
One platform. One login. One source of truth.
The consolidation advantage isn't just about convenience. It's about:
- Data flow — Enrichment data flows directly into video scripts. Website visitor data triggers video outreach automatically. Engagement data informs follow-ups in real time.
- Workflow simplicity — No copying links between tools. No manual data exports. No integration maintenance.
- Cost savings — One platform is almost always cheaper than a stack of five tools.
- Faster onboarding — New reps learn one platform, not five.
For teams focused on efficient outbound lead generation, tool consolidation is a competitive advantage.
Reason 4: Workflow Automation
Sendspark creates videos. Getting those videos into a multi-step outreach sequence is your problem — you need a separate sequencing tool, and you need to manually connect the dots.
MarketBetter's Play Builder makes video a native step in an automated workflow. You build the entire sequence visually:
Audience → Enrich → Generate Video → Send Email → Wait → Follow Up → Multi-Channel
Every step triggers the next automatically. When a new prospect enters the play, they automatically get:
- Their data enriched
- A personalized AI video generated
- An email sent with the video embedded
- Follow-ups triggered based on their engagement
- Multi-channel touches layered in
No manual steps. No tool-switching. No prospects lost in the gaps between tools.
For a complete guide on setting this up, see our article on building a video-first cold outreach workflow.
Reason 5: Animated GIF Thumbnails
Both Sendspark and MarketBetter support visual thumbnails in emails. But MarketBetter's approach is particularly powerful because the GIF is generated automatically from the AI video.
When MarketBetter creates a personalized video, it also generates an animated GIF showing the avatar speaking. This GIF embeds directly in the email body. The prospect opens the email and sees a moving image of someone who appears to be talking to them.
The GIF drives clicks to the full video. Teams using animated GIF thumbnails see 2-3x higher click-through rates compared to static play-button images.
The key difference: with MarketBetter, this is automatic. Every video gets a GIF. Every email gets the thumbnail embedded. No manual work required. Learn more about this in our deep dive on why GIF thumbnails outperform static images.
Reason 6: Visitor Identification + Video
This is a use case Sendspark simply can't replicate because it doesn't have website visitor identification.
MarketBetter identifies anonymous website visitors — turning unknown traffic into named contacts with company data, job titles, and contact information. This data can trigger an automated play that generates a personalized video and sends it to the visitor.
The workflow:
- Prospect visits your website (anonymously)
- MarketBetter identifies them: Sarah, VP of Sales, Acme Corp
- Play triggers: enrich data, generate personalized AI video, send email
- Sarah receives an email with a video that says "Hi Sarah, I noticed you were checking out our platform..."
From anonymous website visit to personalized video email — automatically, within hours. No manual intervention. No research. No recording.
This is the kind of capability that's only possible when video, data, and automation live in one platform.
Reason 7: Better ROI Per Dollar Spent
When you compare total cost of ownership (not just sticker price), MarketBetter often comes out ahead:
Sendspark stack total cost:
- Sendspark: ~$39-89/month per user
- Email sequencing tool: ~$50-100/month per user
- Data provider: ~$100-300/month
- CRM connectors/middleware: ~$50-100/month
- Total: $239-589/month per rep
MarketBetter total cost:
- All-in-one platform (video + email + workflow + data + CRM): One subscription
- Video credits included in plan
- Total: Often 40-60% less than the Sendspark stack
And because MarketBetter's AI videos drive higher engagement rates than manually recorded Sendspark videos, the ROI per dollar is higher on both the cost and the results side.
Making the Switch
If you're considering switching from Sendspark to MarketBetter, here's what the transition looks like:
What You Keep
- Your video outreach strategy (it only gets better with AI)
- Your prospect lists (import them into MarketBetter)
- Your messaging frameworks (adapt them into dynamic scripts)
What Changes
- Recording → Generating — You stop recording yourself and start writing dynamic scripts
- Multiple tools → One platform — Consolidate your stack
- Manual workflow → Automated plays — Build it once, run continuously
- Limited scale → Unlimited scale — Reach your entire pipeline with personalized video
Timeline
Most teams are fully operational within 1-2 weeks:
- Week 1: Platform setup, HeyGen connection, avatar selection, first scripts
- Week 2: Launch first automated plays, measure results, optimize
The Bottom Line
Sendspark is a good video email tool. If all you need is a way to record and send video messages, it works.
But if you've outgrown the manual recording model — if you need video personalization at scale, workflow automation, data enrichment, and a unified platform — MarketBetter is built for where you're going, not where you've been.
The teams that switch consistently report more videos sent, higher engagement rates, more meetings booked, and less time spent managing tools. That's the switch in a nutshell.
Ready to see the difference?
Book a demo and see why sales teams are switching to MarketBetter for AI-powered video outreach. No credit card required.
Related reading: