Skip to main content

Best Clay Alternatives for SDR Teams in 2026: 7 Tools Compared

ยท 6 min read
Share this article

Clay has built a powerful data enrichment platform with 75+ providers, AI-powered research agents, and a flexible credit system. But it's not the right fit for every team.

Common reasons teams look for Clay alternatives:

  • Credit costs escalate quickly โ€” A 5-person SDR team can easily burn $800+/month on enrichment alone
  • No execution tools โ€” Clay enriches data but doesn't include a dialer, visitor ID, or playbook
  • Steep learning curve โ€” Sculptor and Claygent require RevOps expertise most SDR teams don't have
  • You need a complete stack, not another data layer โ€” Adding Clay means managing yet another tool on top of SalesLoft, Outreach, or HubSpot

Here are 7 alternatives worth evaluating, organized by what they do better than Clay.

1. MarketBetter โ€” Best All-in-One SDR Platformโ€‹

Why teams switch from Clay: MarketBetter replaces Clay, your sales engagement platform, and your visitor ID tool with a single platform.

What makes it different:

  • Daily SDR Playbook โ€” Prioritized task list based on real buying signals, not static lead lists
  • Website Visitor Identification โ€” Know which companies are on your site and what they're looking at
  • Smart Dialer โ€” Built-in, warm-calling-optimized dialer (no $7,500/yr add-on)
  • AI Chatbot โ€” Engages every visitor automatically
  • Email Sequences โ€” Hyper-personalized, intent-driven outbound

Pricing: Transparent pricing on website. Everything included โ€” no credits, no add-ons.

Best for: SDR teams of 5-50 who want one platform that tells reps what to do, not just who to target.

See MarketBetter โ†’

2. Apollo.io โ€” Best Budget Alternative with Built-In Outreachโ€‹

Why teams consider Apollo over Clay: Apollo includes a 270M+ contact database AND email sequencing AND a dialer in one platform, starting at $49/user/month.

What makes it different:

  • Per-seat pricing instead of per-credit (more predictable)
  • Built-in email sequences and dialer (Clay requires separate tools)
  • Buyer intent signals and job change alerts
  • Free plan with 600 email credits/month

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • Less enrichment depth (single database vs. 75+ providers)
  • No AI workflow builder like Sculptor
  • Data accuracy varies (phone numbers are a common complaint)

Pricing: Free, Basic ($49/user/mo), Professional ($79/user/mo), Organization ($119/user/mo)

Best for: Budget-conscious teams who want data + outreach in one tool without managing credits.

3. ZoomInfo โ€” Best for Enterprise Data Qualityโ€‹

Why teams consider ZoomInfo over Clay: When data accuracy is non-negotiable, ZoomInfo's verified database and intent data are industry-leading.

What makes it different:

  • Largest verified B2B database with human-verified data
  • Streaming intent data from Bombora partnership
  • Engage product includes cadences, dialer, and chat
  • Org charts and buying committee mapping

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • Pricing starts at $15,000+/year (significantly more expensive)
  • Annual contracts with auto-renewal
  • No AI workflow builder or credit-based flexibility
  • Over-featured for small teams

Pricing: SalesOS starts ~$15,000/year. Typical mid-market deals run $25,000-60,000/year.

Best for: Enterprise teams (100+ employees) where data quality directly impacts close rates.

4. Cognism โ€” Best for European and International Dataโ€‹

Why teams consider Cognism over Clay: Cognism specializes in phone-verified mobile numbers and GDPR-compliant data, particularly for European markets.

What makes it different:

  • 98% mobile phone number accuracy (phone-verified by humans)
  • GDPR and CCPA compliant by design
  • Intent data powered by Bombora
  • Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • Higher price point (typically $15,000-30,000/year)
  • Less customizable workflows
  • Smaller total database than Apollo or ZoomInfo
  • Limited AI automation compared to Clay's Sculptor

Pricing: Quote-based. Typically $1,000-2,500/user/month for teams of 5+.

Best for: Teams selling into European markets where GDPR compliance and mobile number accuracy are critical.

5. Clearbit (now HubSpot Breeze Intelligence) โ€” Best for HubSpot-Native Enrichmentโ€‹

Why teams consider Clearbit over Clay: If you're already on HubSpot, Breeze Intelligence provides native enrichment without another platform to manage.

What makes it different:

  • Native HubSpot integration (no data sync issues)
  • Company and contact enrichment directly in your CRM
  • Buyer intent scoring based on fit and engagement
  • Form shortening for higher conversion rates

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • Only works with HubSpot (vendor lock-in)
  • Fewer data providers than Clay's marketplace
  • No AI workflow builder
  • Limited to enrichment โ€” no outbound tools

Pricing: Included in HubSpot's higher tiers or available as Breeze Intelligence credits ($0.01-0.03/credit).

Best for: HubSpot-heavy teams who want enrichment without adding another platform.

6. Lusha โ€” Best for Quick Contact Lookupโ€‹

Why teams consider Lusha over Clay: Lusha is simpler and cheaper for teams that just need accurate contact data without complex workflows.

What makes it different:

  • Chrome extension for instant LinkedIn contact lookup
  • Direct dial and email finder with high accuracy
  • Simple per-credit pricing starting at $49/month
  • Fast setup (minutes, not days)

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • No AI research agents or workflow automation
  • Smaller database than Clay's 75+ provider marketplace
  • Limited intent data
  • No enrichment waterfall

Pricing: Free (50 credits/month), Pro ($49/user/mo), Premium ($79/user/mo), Scale (custom).

Best for: Individual SDRs or small teams who need quick, accurate contact data without workflow complexity.

7. 6sense โ€” Best for Enterprise Intent Dataโ€‹

Why teams consider 6sense over Clay: 6sense's AI-powered account identification and intent data platform is purpose-built for ABM and enterprise GTM.

What makes it different:

  • AI-predicted buying stage for accounts
  • Anonymous visitor identification (company-level)
  • Orchestration across ads, email, and sales
  • Deep Salesforce and HubSpot integrations

Where it falls short vs Clay:

  • Enterprise pricing only ($60,000-120,000+/year)
  • Complex implementation (3-6 months)
  • Overkill for outbound-focused SDR teams
  • Dashboard-heavy (data presentation, not action guidance)

Pricing: Custom, typically $60,000-120,000+/year.

Best for: Large enterprises running account-based marketing programs with $100K+ tool budgets.

Quick Comparison Tableโ€‹

ToolStarting PriceEnrichmentDialerVisitor IDPlaybookBest For
Clay$149/moโœ… 75+ providersโŒโŒโŒRevOps teams building custom workflows
MarketBetterSee websiteโœ…โœ…โœ…โœ…SDR teams needing all-in-one platform
Apollo$49/user/moโœ… Single DBโœ…โŒโŒBudget-conscious teams
ZoomInfo~$15K/yrโœ… Verifiedโœ… (Engage)โœ…โŒEnterprise data quality
CognismCustomโœ… Phone-verifiedโŒโŒโŒEuropean market data
ClearbitHubSpot tiersโœ… NativeโŒโŒโŒHubSpot-centric teams
Lusha$49/user/moโœ… BasicโŒโŒโŒQuick contact lookup
6sense~$60K/yrโœ… IntentโŒโœ…โŒEnterprise ABM

How to Chooseโ€‹

If you need data + action in one platform: MarketBetter or Apollo

If you need maximum enrichment customization: Stay with Clay

If you need enterprise-grade verified data: ZoomInfo or Cognism

If you need intent-driven ABM: 6sense

If you're on HubSpot and want native enrichment: Clearbit/Breeze Intelligence

If you just need contact lookup: Lusha

The best Clay alternative depends on whether your bottleneck is data quality (stay with Clay or move to ZoomInfo) or SDR productivity (consider MarketBetter or Apollo).

Book a demo to see how MarketBetter replaces your data + outreach stack โ†’

Share this article